Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation

ietf-asrg

Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation

2003-05-08 14:03:40

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:32:26PM -0600, Vernon Schryver wrote:


That check is only the first check.  If it fails, then no harm is done.


Great. A check that doesn't work in common, that does not much 
more than "no harm", and which's behaviour cannot be specified
in a technical or scientific way. 

That's indeed a great example of security engineering.

Hadmut

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats), Paul Judge [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Alan DeKok Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Hadmut Danisch Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Hadmut Danisch <= Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, J C Lawrence Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Vernon Schryver Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Mike Rubel [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Paul Vixie Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, David Walker Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, J C Lawrence Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, william Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, Hadmut Danisch Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, william Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, Hadmut Danisch

Previous by Date:	[Asrg] Joseph Melle and AOL, Yakov Shafranovich
Next by Date:	Re: [Asrg] Re: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for Fightin, Barry Shein
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Vernon Schryver
Next by Thread:	Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, J C Lawrence
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]