If Spam-Arrest
operated in the EU, its operation would be illegal (not the
anti-spamming
law, the data protection laws)
I believe this is correct.
I don't play an EU Data Commissioner on the net, though I have periodically
spoken at length with several (Berlin chiefly). "Illegal" is not something
I'd buy or sell, however, the retention, recipient, access and possibly a
few other aspects of Spam-Arrest-the-data-collector behavior are, IMO, likely
to be of interest to the DatenSchutz, for any non-sonombulist local value of
DatenSchutz. Anglophones can stick with the UK DP rules.
See the P3P schema, we put all of it there we knew about.
Most MTA operators only keep "traffic data" for a short time. A C/R
operator must keep some traffic data "forever".
See <retention>, but see also <purpose> elements in the P3P schema.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg