Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?

Anyway, rfc954 is irrelevant ...


The issues of bulk-, and :42-access to whois data are balloted in the
membership body of registrars for the COM/NET/ORG/BIZ/INFO/NAME set
of top-level domains.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Bob Wyman Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Barry Shein Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, waltdnes Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Jeffrey Race Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Tom Thomson Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Tom Thomson Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <= Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Daniel Feenberg Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Jeffrey Race Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric D. Williams