At 10:53 AM +0100 5/18/03, Jon Kyme wrote:
>
Interesting that the results vary so much by ISP. Yahoo accounts are
pretty valid. Hotmail accounts are pretty bad. AOL is quite good.
Earthlink has a problem. MSN's slightly better, but still negative.
Of course yahoo will say 250 to pretty much anything.
So these addresses are "valid" in what sense exactly?
They said "no" to 16% of the messages I queried them on. The
specific message they used was:
553 VS10-RT Possible forgery or deactivated due to abuse (#5.1.1)
Can you show instances in which they say yes to messages they cannot deliver?
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Junk-Free Email Filtering
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg