Aye, I agree.
On Sunday, May 04, 2003 7:11 PM, Kee Hinckley
[SMTP:nazgul(_at_)somewhere(_dot_)com] wrote:
At 12:39 PM -0400 5/4/03, Eric D. Williams wrote:
no protocol interaction. There are some I suspect who would argue that all
'spaminess' must be detected in the SMTP transactions (and that has
advantages)
Given that two different people may consider the same list to be, or
not be, spam. And that it is not always possible to determine the
final recipient at the SMTP transaction point, I think it's pretty
clear that this isn't possible.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Junk-Free Email Filtering
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg