At 08:16 PM 5/29/2003 -0400, Eric Dean wrote:
> Look at TitanKey as another type of C/R system that issues challenges at
> the SMTP level. That's essentially what it is. As for pros and
> cons of C/R
> systems, that has been debated before many times. C/R systems exist and
> will increase, we are just making sense out of chaos here. Perhaps Eric
> Dean can add the STMP-reject method to his C/R draft.
Just a point of clarification..I'm looking at C/R interworking..a method for
automation and loop prevention...not at specifying how to build a C/R
system. With respect to this particular response code method...I'm not sure
what should be done for interworking systems with that feature.
What I meant is something that I mentioned in a prior post - ability for
C/R systems to interoperate at the SMTP level not just mail messages level.
This would save a lot of bandwidth and storage space.
Yakov
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg