Barry Shein <bzs(_at_)world(_dot_)std(_dot_)com> wrote:
See, if one doesn't understand their MO's one tends to imagine them
only doing stuff that's easy and comfortable to think about.
So the people coming up with proposals are stupid.
That's a MUCH better argument than coming up with technical and
quantitative flaws in a proposal.
My message, as someone who has sat on the front-lines of all this for
many years, is:
a) Spam is more subtle than most people, even those who think they
understand it, think.
b) It's unlikely a technical solution will ever work.
Then please unsubscribe from the list, and get out of the way of
people who ARE trying to come up with a technical solution.
Maybe a miracle will occur, and a solution you can't image will be
presented. But that's less likely to occur if people sit here and
oppose every proposal, based on non-technical reasons.
Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg