william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net wrote on 09 May 2003 at 06:06
Envelope "From:" is the worst case since most mailing lists use their own
mailfrom and do not change "From:" (do not assume that what you see in
outlook is what others would see or that its really how mailist messsage
looks like)
Sorry, I will make that assumption. So will you, if you know what you are
talking about. So far as I can see, Outlook will display the headers exactly
as received, except that it wil add a Sender: header where relevant in
conformance with the standard. Since RFC2822 headers are distinct from
RFC2822 content they are of course displayed in a different window from the
content, which is useful behaviour since the headers are long and it would
be boring to have to skip over them every time (certainly I used to find it
that way in the days of MUAs which displayed header plus content as a single
unit).
I've appended below the email headers that Outlook reports for the message
to which I am replying. If you think any of these is not correct (ie
Outloook has got it wrong) please let me know and I'll take it up with M$.
If you don't think any of it is wrong, perhaps you'll not make silly
accusations about Outlook in future.
Tom
Received: from www1.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by mail.neosinteractive.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
Fri, 9 May 2003 13:29:26 +0100
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4982I811640;
Fri, 9 May 2003 04:02:18 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176])
by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h497xr811361
for <asrg(_at_)optimus(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org>; Fri, 9 May 2003 03:59:53
-0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA08152
for <asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; Fri, 9 May 2003 03:49:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1])
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 19E2fG-0002N4-00
for asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; Fri, 09 May 2003 03:51:34 -0400
Received: from sokol.elan.net ([216.151.192.200])
by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 19E2fF-0002N1-00
for asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; Fri, 09 May 2003 03:51:33 -0400
Received: from sokol.elan.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by sokol.elan.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h495627W017107
for <asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; Thu, 8 May 2003 22:06:02 -0700
Received: from localhost (william(_at_)localhost)
by sokol.elan.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id h49562ML017103
for <asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>; Thu, 8 May 2003 22:06:02 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: sokol.elan.net: william owned process doing -bs
To: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
In-Reply-To: <200305090131(_dot_)33356(_at_)grx>
Message-ID:
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)44(_dot_)0305082050400(_dot_)1089-100000(_at_)sokol(_dot_)elan(_dot_)net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Errors-To: asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
X-BeenThere: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,
<mailto:asrg-request(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 22:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2003 12:29:26.0747 (UTC)
FILETIME=[A15052B0:01C31626]
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg