From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner(_at_)nic-naa(_dot_)net>
> It's worthwhile to remember that the current majority of spam is not
> the only kind. ...
Thanks. I've been fixating on the low-cost transients. For the cost-capable
models (persistent), the "reputable businesses with endpoint identifiers,
aka personal indentifiers" problem, different treatment.
The P3P Specification Working Group has a "P3P beyond HTTP" task force,
which cheritably might include disclosure ((via the <access> element), via
protocols other than HTTP, SOAP, etc., e.g., including SMTP) of how the
recipient's address was acquired or may be unacquired or corrected, and so
on. It also has a "Compact policies" task force for which an xml-2-ebnf
transform is possible. An xml-2-XYZ (aka "developer-readable language")
wire encoding optimization already exists for HTTP cookies.
Should we be developing proposals in this area as well? Part of our charter
is developing consent-based communication?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg