At 10:31 AM 5/2/03 -0400, Ken Hirsch wrote:
[snip happens]
IV. CHALLENGE-RESPONSE
Mailblocks holds and is enforcing two patents on challenge response.
(US 6,199,102 and US 6,112,227)
This doesn't kill the idea entirely, but I do think it's bad form to
require something that uses patented technology without at least
mentioning the patent.
P.S.
I Hope the pending lawsuit will make this point moot.
Shameless plug for my take on the subject, and a plea for more prior art;
http://www.spamwolf.com/patents/
Scott Nelson <scott(_at_)spamwolf(_dot_)com>
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg