At 10:29 25/05/03 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
At the FTC workshop, speakers from states having laws were quite clear
that they were NOT having an effect on spam.
Did any of them have a real "anti-spam" law"? There's only one state that
has a true (opt-in) anti-spam law. CAUCE has been saying for years that
opt-out ant anti-forgery laws won't have any spam-reduction impact, so
pointing at such laws and saying "laws don't work" seems to lack foundation.
Expecting laws requiring opt-out and anti-forgery to stop spam is like
expecting an "anti bank robbery law" to work because it makes bank robbery
illegal unless the robber wears a pink tu-tu and respects a request not to
do it to that bank again. All such a law would do would be to increase the
sales of pink tu-tus. Nobody would seriously call such a law "anti bank
robbery", and nobody should seriously call an opt-out law "anti spam".
--
Troy Rollo Chairman, CAUBE.AU
asrg(_at_)troy(_dot_)rollo(_dot_)name Executive Director,
iCAUCE
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg