On Friday, May 23, 2003 4:10 PM, Paul Judge
[SMTP:paul(_dot_)judge(_at_)ciphertrust(_dot_)com]
wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Yakov Shafranovich [mailto:research(_at_)solidmatrix(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 3:20 PM
To: asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was
[Yet another] article on spam)
At 06:13 AM 5/23/2003 +0900, Shannon Jacobs wrote:
However, with email we have the potential to do much better if we
devise the proper economic model. Right now the spammers are
forcing us to spend additional money handling their spam. More machines for
filtering.
8<...>8
Perhaps we can start a discussion about the economic models
of spam control and various systems possible. Below is a quote
from section 1.7. of Dave Crocker's draft on spam control
mechanims
(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-spam-techconsider-01.txt)
,
we can start off discussion with this:
8<...>8
One such system was presented at the ASRG meeting at IETF 56. The system is
called SHRED: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/03mar/slides/asrg-8.pdf. If
we are going to start a dicussion about cost-based systems, then we should
start we the thought that has been put into this proposal.
I agree.
According to our taxonomy, these approaches can be considered a form of
consent token or a response of charging after spam detection depending on
the use.
Which is why I am forwarding this suggestion. It may also be appropriate to
explore the synergism of 'filtering' and such a system.
Of course that would be apropos of the Filtering draft.
-e
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg