Issues like this:
http://www.toyz.org/SpamArrestSpams.html
Summary: Alleges SpamArrest harvests sender addresses
I see privacy issues for challenge/response systems, but that's not
one.
Perhaps I should have said "data protection" (as we call it in the UK).
Ths SpamArrest abuse is a potential problem in any system where
you let a third party with handle your mail. It is a consideration
in any system where that involves asking a third party anything about
mail, including DNS blacklists.
Of course the *sender* isn't aware (in advance) that this particular
3rd party is handling the mail.
I think any spam filtering RFC ought to have a section on privacy
like the required section on security.
That would be nice. No negative privacy impact is a "requirement".
I think we had a fairly good consensus on the
Requirements...
Hi Jon
Can you produce the normal spreadsheet of the blackcatsmail
users please?
It seems that this is a regular request at the start of
every month
Regards
Bernie Friery
Web Development Manager
===============================
Connect Internet Solutions Ltd
Phone +44 (0)151 794 6699
Fax +44 (0)151 794 8233
|
--