On Sat, 10 May 2003 10:05:56 -0400
Paul Judge <paul(_dot_)judge(_at_)ciphertrust(_dot_)com> wrote:
Additionally, a proposal for a C/R protocol would be useful. This
would permit interaction between different C/R systems and allow
integration into MTAs and MUAs.
Given that the response portion and the transport used for the response
(email, web, phone, IM, XML/RPC, other) are unstandardisable, that only
leaves the challenge side.
Is there anything required by a challenge that's different from a
vacation bot?
Does anyone have a set of thoughts in either of these two directions
that they would like to put together and move forward?
For *JUST* C/R, the vacation bot spec seems sufficient. If you're
trying to glue C/R into another system, like a consent token system,
them I've already written a little on that aspect.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw(_at_)kanga(_dot_)nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg