ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9

2003-06-17 05:48:22
 
did you get the messages in order or out of order?  the list has been

Out of order.

really slow for me.  did you get the original "summary" page that
listed all the objections?


Yes... finally

my reading of rfc2822 3.6.4 indicates that multiple references are
discouraged only in the special case that a message has "multiple
inheritance" from more than one thread.


And if the message doesn't have multiple parents... why have multiple
references?

For what it's worth the order I got was:

23:09   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objections 3 and 4
22:43   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections
22:16   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 6
22:03   Meng Weng Wong  Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9
21:30   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9
20:52   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 7
20:24   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8
20:16   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objections 1 and 2
20:02   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 5
19:33   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>
18:40   Meng Weng Wong  [Asrg] Re: SPF: Summary of Objections, erratum

I don't believe you can count on a "fine" ordering on a list like this.  


Regards,
jrk

 







--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>