|-----Original Message-----
|From: asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]
On
|Behalf Of Yakov Shafranovich
<snip>
|>Currently the way the XML-CPDL example works is to define scope in
|>terms of a SYSTEM. A SYSTEM might be a user, organization, etc...
<snip>
|Would any of this be relevant to the consent framework? Do we need to
|define further what SCOPE is and how it works within the
|consent framework,
|or should that be something that is left for the language?
That is a good question.
The XML-CPDL is _somewhat_ agnostic on the application of SCOPE, but
fairly definite on it's implementation. I think at the very least we
should be sure that SCOPE as defined in the consent framework is not
incompatible with the XML-CPDL. We should probably endeavor to make a
direct linkage between the two - and where that is not possible explain
how the two interact.
_M
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg