I want to pose a question to the group. The charter of the ASRG
concentrates on the notion of consent for email. However, we need to
look at whether this is the only approach to controlling spam:
"The research group will investigate the feasibility of: (1) a single
architecture that supports this and (2) a framework that allows
different systems to be plugged in to provide different pieces of the
solution. "
Even if the consent framework is completed, is it really the only way to
look at spam? Perhaps, we should as many have suggested, reformulate the
charter of the group to be more generic - to perhaps look at other
possibilities beside consent. As of now the charter does include this:
"ASRG will investigate the spam problem as a large-scale network
problem. The ASRG will begin its work by developing a taxonomy of the
problem and the proposed solutions. This taxonomy should involve casting
the spam problem into different perspectives, such as examining the
similarities between spam and denial-of-service; spam and intrusion
detection/prevention; and spam and authentication, authorization, and
accounting."
I think we would need another effort to take place parallel with the
consent framework - an evaluation of whether it is proper to add consent
to email.
Thoughts?
Yakov
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg