Dag Kihlman wrote:
From: "David Maxwell" <david(_at_)crlf(_dot_)net>
[..]
I have nothing against looking at replacements for SMTP - but I would
suggest that it should occur on a sub-list. It's a longer term project
than tweaking the existing protocol, and I'd prefer that it not bog down
discussions of changes that could be made more rapidly.
I agree. But I think we are too few to discuss this issue and the number of
possible implementations are too many.
If sufficient interest can be gathered, we can look into a subgroup.
Yakov
-------
Yakov Shafranovich / asrg <at> shaftek.org
SolidMatrix Technologies, Inc. / research <at> solidmatrix.com
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" (Lord
Acton)
-------
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg