Matthew Elvey <matthew(_at_)elvey(_dot_)com> wrote:
And I forgot - of course MAIL FROM: <> needs to be mentioned as a
special case.
Yes, I'll add that.
Something like this is needed:
"Email submitted to a secondary MX for relay to the primary MX MUST
somehow have the LMAP policy of the domain it claims to be from queried
and applied." . If only the secondary receiving the email will have
enough information, then this could be said more simply.
Should this be added to one of the LMAP draft documents?
I'll add it to the discussion draft.
I just thought of another possible problem with LMAP. If a spammer
using direct-to-MX spamware sends email to me, from me, (as I'd bet they
regularly do) it may not be caught by LMAP.
That's a local configuration issue.
Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg