LMAP-related discussions for SPF and other proposals have moved to the
MXCOMP list (http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/).
Yakov
Radu Hociung wrote:
Unfortunately,
A spammer can just as well set this up. This system does not
discriminate based on the intention or identity of the sender.
Also, I think a good test to any anti-spam proposal is this: Would this
be a sustainable model if it became mainstream?
Your approach relies on a lot of wasted resources at the DNS cache
level; imagine what would happen to Hotmail's caching DNS servers if
they would cache two entries for every 2.5B spam messages they receive
every day?
I didn't like the pop-ups.
I appreciate the effort, though; you may have something, but it needs
more work.
Radu.
--
Radu Hociung
radu(_at_)ohmi(_dot_)org
-----Original Message-----
*From:* asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:asrg-admin(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] *On Behalf
Of *spharion(_at_)directnet(_dot_)com(_dot_)br
*Sent:* Saturday, March 27, 2004 7:10 AM
*To:* asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
*Subject:* [Asrg] spf
this is a tentative option to spf, but does not
seem to break forwarding:
http://nucleo.freeservers.com/mba/
have fun. gone, ricardo.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg