On 30 Apr 2004, at 15:30, Seth Breidbart wrote:
Perhaps 2.2 should say "Failing to meet the criteria for listing MUST
be
sufficient grounds for delisting".
Why? I see no problem with a "sticky" list; for instance, to get
listed an IP must send >X amount of spam in Y time, to get unlisted it
must send <.1X in 10Y.
Because this is confusing.
However I don't think it's entirely incompatible with the BCP. The
listing criteria could be as simple as "We have detected spam coming
from this IP address". How you "detected" it (by spam levels exceeding
a threshold) and how you "undetect" it is up to you.
Matt.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg