ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] Filtering spam by detecting 'anti-Bayesian' elements?

2004-09-20 09:29:03
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:42:31PM +1000, Laird Breyer wrote:
I don't know. Do you treat header content separately from body
content?  Many Bayesian filters read both header and body together,
which gives quite a lot of information. Some treat each part
separately and then combine them.  Even a spam with an empty body has
routing information and bogus sender details, which adds up to a few
quality tokens. It really depends. 

The Spammers' Compendium
    http://www.jgc.org/tsc/

has a list of tricks spammers use to beat bayesian filters.

What is missing what I have seen lately is the use of e.g.

|_)      
|_)|_|\/ 
      /  
  _    ___                       
 | |  / (_)___ _____ __________ _
 | | / / / __ `/ __ `/ ___/ __ `/
 | |/ / / /_/ / /_/ / /  / /_/ / 
 |___/_/\__,_/\__, /_/   \__,_/  
             /____/              
                                       .o. 
                                       888 
ooo. .oo.    .ooooo.  oooo oooo    ooo 888 
`888P"Y88b  d88' `88b  `88. `88.  .8'  Y8P 
 888   888  888   888   `88..]88..8'   `8' 
 888   888  888   888    `888'`888'    .o. 
o888o o888o `Y8bod8P'     `8'  `8'     Y8P 


to beat a bayesian filter.

Also spammers start poisoning headers with lines like:
    X-Literature: Once upon a time ...
which they expand for a few lines, just as they add randon words or
literature in the text part of multipart/alternative messages.

        \Maex

-- 
SpaceNet AG            | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development |       D-80807 Muenchen    | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
"The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally
 proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin"

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>