On 2006-01-31 18:15:05 +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Bill Cole wrote:
What it *is and always has been* for functional forwarding
systems is the original value, unmodified by the forwarder.
That's wrong, STD 10 clearly demanded to add the host to the
reverse path.
For a host forwarder.example and MAIL
FROM:<user(_at_)do(_dot_)main(_dot_)test>
that became MAIL FROM:<@forwarder.example:user(_at_)do(_dot_)main(_dot_)test>
The reverse path _was_ modified before 1123.
Was it? Just because RFC 822 demanded it, doesn't necessarily mean it
was ever widely implemented.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Ich sehe nun ein, dass Computer wenig
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | geeignet sind, um sich was zu merken.
| | | hjp(_at_)hjp(_dot_)at |
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Holger Lembke in dan-am
pgp3tSOGxHBpx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg