On 3/4/2010 9:16 AM, Paul Russell wrote:
On 3/4/2010 08:59, Dennis Dayman wrote:
Interesting article
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=123574
The author is not interested in reducing or eliminating spam; he simply wants
tools to validate his delusion that his spam is not spam.
I wouldn't be quite so harsh. But... He completely glosses over a
number of fundamental differences between 1-to-many _marketing_ and what
is essentially bidirectional communications (eg: facebook), both
technical and social, not the least being that the marketer has an
enormous and irresistible incentive to cheat - as they already do (eg:
bogus "testimonials" etc).
And furthermore, if they did implement a TINS that actually functioned
(FSVOF), I think they'd be very disappointed by the turnout.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg