David MacQuigg <dmquigg-clear(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com> wrote:
http://purl.net/macquigg/email/...
]
] EHLO mailserver7.bigforwarder.com
] ID bigforwarder.com
] MAIL FROM:<bob(_at_)sales(_dot_)some-company(_dot_)com>
(omitting the 250-ID response...)
There is an interesting issue here for CSV.
This sort of mechanism could be a win for receiving SMTP servers that
do not do the full upward search for SRV records (assuming, of course,
that the "ID" sends a different string than the "EHLO").
I am not sure it's a significant win overall; and I'm not the least
bit sure that we'd have any reason to trust the "ID" string where it
isn't a superdomain of the EHLO string -- unless this draft was changed
to prohibit more than one "ID" per "EHLO".
Nonetheless, there might be something worth discussing...
--
John Leslie <john(_at_)jlc(_dot_)net>