ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Design approach to MASS (was Re: [ietf-dkim] On per-user-keying)

2005-08-11 11:14:09
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:42:32 -0500, Earl Hood wrote:
 Failure to respond just gives the impression that lip service is being given.


Process point:

IETF rough consensus is predicated on developing support for a view. Hence, 
developing that support is a fundamental hurdle that is a natural and 
constructive part of the IETF process.

Participants in an IETF process are not obligated to respond to anyone's 
postings.

So, failure to respond to someone's view is nothing more than an indication of 
lack of support for that view and, therefore, its failure to pass this basic 
hurdle.


  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net



_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>