For those who don't know, I've implemented and deployed the full DKIM
(base+SSP) some weeks ago in a new version of my MTA.
My customers are reporting that they are receiving DKIM signed messages from
"s=2005; d=replies.em.bankofamerica.com". These message successfully
interoperate. I have one of these messages myself and judging from the
DKIM-Signature header, this domain is using a custom implementation because
the header construction looks different than what would be produced from our
lib or Murray's.
Anyway, just FYI.
--
Arvel
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org