Phillip wrote:
> A comment that came up internaly from folk who are not directly
> involved:
>
> The charter says that the group will not look at key distribution
> infrastructure. So they are not going to distribute keys in the DNS
> after all?
>
> I think its just a wording issue, insert the word 'other'
> appropriately.
Stephen wrote:
So instead of:
* Additional key management protocols or infrastructure.
Maybe:
* Generic key management protocols or infrastructure.
I think the comment that Phillip reports on was from before the last
iteration, where it said
> * Key management, including key-distribution infrastructure.
Several people pointed out the problem in that, and we changed it to the
current
> * Additional key management protocols or infrastructure.
I think it's fine as it currently is, yes? I don't think it needs
changing again.
Barry
--
Barry Leiba, Pervasive Computing Technology
(leiba(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com)
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org