Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: dkim service

On October 14, 2005 at 07:06, Michael Thomas wrote:

> The one thing we know for sure at this point is that
> more -- and reliable -- input for spam filters is better
> than less. So from that standpoint alone, unspecified
> semantics are preferable to removing information.
Not necessarily.  With unspecified semantics, different receivers will
create different rules, giving avenues of exploitation by attackers.

--ewh
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org