Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM proposed charter tweak

Sorry to follow myself up, but...

Michael Thomas wrote:
> That said, in lieu of a BCP I'd rather this sort of guidance go
> in the security considerations, or some other non-normative section
> of -base or -ssp as it's obvious that I have to read those, and not
> at all obvious that I should read the threat analysis.
I meant from an implementor's standpoint, not a wg participant's
standpoint.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org