Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM proposed charter tweak

> 2) We are putting a lot into the "threat summary", certainly far more than 
> is implied by its name.  It seems pretty unlikely that an implementor is 
> going to be reading an IETF "threats analysis" document, for 
> implementation guidance
I'm happy to go with the flow on this change but my own experience is that 
Dave is absolutely right on the point above.  I'd be looking for a BCP or 
implementation guide.
--
Arvel




_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org