On Nov 7, 2005, at 6:24 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On 11/07/2005 20:37, Douglas Otis wrote:
DKIM without SSP can be better than with SSP. Take out the SSP
approach, and there should be fewer concerns with respect to
potential impact, while there would not be any benefit lost. If
anything there would be greater benefits as this approach offers more
information without incurring additional overhead.
I've no doubt that DKIM without SSP would be better for providers
of large
scale commercial reputation services. It would be pretty useless
for me.
DKIM without SSP provides an ability for Name-based white-listing of
transports. Name-based white-listing/reputation would not be prone
to IP address exploits. Filtering programs would have a verifiable
source for a message to permit a significant reduction in related
errors. If there was abuse, there would be a verified name for
addressing complaints. Why would that be useless for you?
What major benefit do you expect?
-Doug
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org