On Nov 21, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Jim Schaad wrote:
In my mail I explicity said that reviewing the goals of SSP is NOT
part of
this document. I said that an appendix could explain what SSP is
and how it
might be used to extend the base document. I think that SSP needs
to do
it's own version of the same document.
Jim,
I was looking at section D of your email. The binding recognition
strategy being suggested adds binding advice within a base draft.
This approach does not rely upon _any_ element of SSP. The ability
to defeat spoofing would be greatly improved while not relying upon
the visual examination of email identifiers for each message received.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org