-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Scott
Kitterman
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:04 AM
To: 'IETF DKIM WG'
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on the Threat Draft -
draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:14:48 -0800 "Jim Schaad"
<ietf(_at_)augustcellars(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Jim,
I have some comments on this draft that I would like to make.
...
F. Potential Extensions to the base document (I would prefer
this to be
labeled as appendix rather than section of the document for
clarity).
This would include such things as SSP, reputation services
and other items.
It seems a bit odd to me to put part of the planned work of
the working group off in an appendix with other future work
that's outside the scope of the charter.
I think all of the proposed work of the working group should
be addressed in a normative part of the document.
Scott K
Scott,
I want this document to focus on a single topic, the base document. From
reading the list there seems to be a lot of arguments from different people
about SSP that I just want to avoid right now and let them come up with
respect to the SSP document rather than infecting the base and threat
documents.
Additionally there have been a large number of different types of extensions
proposed by other people that could work. I would put them all together in
dealing with the base document as potential future work for somebody ---
where somebody could be this group.
Jim
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org