Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted summary, SSP again

> but the intent has always focused on the need for a
> first party signature, not abhorance of multiple
> signatures.

This was my understanding as well.  In fact, if there's a valid first 
party signature our lib doesn't even make an SSP check AFAIK so it 
wouldn't be able to determine policy relative to third party sigs.
--
Arvel




_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org