RE: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/27

• RE: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net, 2006/02/27
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/27
  • RE: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net, 2006/02/27
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/28
  • RE: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net, 2006/02/28

[ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net, 2006/02/27

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/27
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/27
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, william(at)elan.net, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Threats Issue - Large DNS records make servers targets for spoofed source amplification attacks abuse, stephen . farrell, 2006/02/28

[ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/25

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, John Levine, 2006/02/25
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/25
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/25
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/25
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Ned Freed, 2006/02/25
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Ned Freed, 2006/02/26
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/26
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Ned Freed, 2006/02/26
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Steve Atkins, 2006/02/25
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Wietse Venema, 2006/02/25
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/26
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Ned Freed, 2006/02/26
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Scott Kitterman, 2006/02/26
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/27
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/26
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eric Rescorla, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eric Rescorla, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Eric Rescorla, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Mark Delany, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/27
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/27
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Scott Kitterman, 2006/02/27
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/27
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/27
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Core algorithm support/use, draft text v2, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/28

[ietf-dkim] signature h= and z= tags, Hector Santos, 2006/02/22

• Re: [ietf-dkim] signature h= and z= tags, Hector Santos, 2006/02/24
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: signature h= and z= tags, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/25

[ietf-dkim] authentification-results draft?, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/22

• Re: [ietf-dkim] authentification-results draft?, J.D. Falk, 2006/02/22
  • Message not available
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] authentification-results draft?, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/22
• Re: [ietf-dkim] authentification-results draft?, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/22
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: authentification-results draft?, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] authentification-results draft?, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/22

[ietf-dkim] Draft DKIM agenda for Dallas., Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/21

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft DKIM agenda for Dallas., Dave Crocker, 2006/02/21
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft DKIM agenda for Dallas., Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/21
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft DKIM agenda for Dallas., Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/21
• [ietf-dkim] Open Issues at this time, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/22

[ietf-dkim] issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/21

• Re: [ietf-dkim] issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/21
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/22
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: issue with DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/22

[ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/20

• Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/21
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/21
• Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas, 2006/02/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hector Santos, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, william(at)elan.net, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hector Santos, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas, 2006/02/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/22
    • No new PKIs! (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?), Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/22
    • Re: No new PKIs! (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?), Douglas Otis, 2006/02/22
    • Re: No new PKIs! (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?), Mark Delany, 2006/02/22
    • Re: No new PKIs! (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?), Douglas Otis, 2006/02/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Ned Freed, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Mark Delany, 2006/02/22
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/21
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Mark Delany, 2006/02/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/22
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Scott Kitterman, 2006/02/23
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/23
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/23
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/23
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/23
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/23
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/23
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/23
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas, 2006/02/23
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Mark Delany, 2006/02/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, John Levine, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, John R Levine, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/24
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/23
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/24
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hector Santos, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Steve Atkins, 2006/02/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/25
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Jon Callas, 2006/02/25
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/25
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/24
• RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/24
  • RE: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, John R Levine, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/24
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] agenda item on upgrading hash algorithms?, Hector Santos, 2006/02/24

[ietf-dkim] another try at my question on options in TXT records, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/20

• Re: [ietf-dkim] another try at my question on options in TXT records, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/20
• Re: [ietf-dkim] another try at my question on options in TXT records, Mark Delany, 2006/02/20
  • [ietf-dkim] New Issue: extensions to the RR, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/21
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] another try at my question on options in TXT records, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] another try at my question on options in TXT records, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/21
• Message not available
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] another try at my question on options in TXT records, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/21
• RE: [ietf-dkim] another try at my question on options in TXT records, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/21

RE: [ietf-dkim] small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXTrecord, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/20

• Re: [ietf-dkim] small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXTrecord, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/20
• RE: [ietf-dkim] small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXTrecord, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/21
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXTrecord, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/21

RE: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/20

• RE: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Daniel Dreymann, 2006/02/20
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/20
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Jon Callas, 2006/02/22
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Jon Callas, 2006/02/22
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Bill.Oxley, 2006/02/21
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/21
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/21
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Hector Santos, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/22
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/21
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/22
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Eric Rescorla, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/22
    • [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Jon Callas, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Ned Freed, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Ned Freed, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Hector Santos, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Ned Freed, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Mark Delany, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Hector Santos, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Mark Delany, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now, Hector Santos, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/22
  • RE: [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Ned Freed, 2006/02/22

[ietf-dkim] small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/20

• Re: [ietf-dkim] small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/20
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/21
• Re: [ietf-dkim] small question in draft-ietf-dkim-base-00.txt on TXT record, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/20

[ietf-dkim] OT: DK credits, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/19

• Re: [ietf-dkim] OT: DK credits, Jon Callas, 2006/02/22
• RE: [ietf-dkim] OT: DK credits, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/20
  • [ietf-dkim] OT: DK credits, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/21

[ietf-dkim] Quite a lot of DKIM at Dallas IETF, John Levine, 2006/02/18

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Quite a lot of DKIM at Dallas IETF, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/20
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Quite a lot of DKIM at Dallas IETF, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Quite a lot of DKIM at Dallas IETF, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/20

[ietf-dkim] SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Mark Delany, 2006/02/16

• Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/16
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/17
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Eric Allman, 2006/02/17
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/17
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Eric Allman, 2006/02/17
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/17
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/17
• [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/16
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Mark Delany, 2006/02/16
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/17
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: SSP - should we drop the cryptic o=. syntax for something a little more readable?, william(at)elan.net, 2006/02/17

[ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Mark Delany, 2006/02/16

• Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/16
• Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM, 2006/02/17
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/17
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM, 2006/02/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Mark Delany, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Hector Santos, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM, 2006/02/23
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Hector Santos, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/22
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP - should r= be localpart only?, SM, 2006/02/23

[ietf-dkim] (-base document) clarifications on use of l= tag, Eric Allman, 2006/02/15

• [ietf-dkim] Re: (-base document) clarifications on use of l= tag, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/15

[ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany, 2006/02/15

• Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/15
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/15
    • [ietf-dkim] Supporting alternate algorithms, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/15
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: Supporting alternate algorithms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/15
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Eric Allman, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/15
• Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/15
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/15
• Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/16
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Steve Atkins, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/16
    • Message not available
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/17
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/17
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Base: Upgrade indication and protection against downgrade attacks, Mark Delany, 2006/02/16

RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Markley, Mike, 2006/02/14

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/14
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/14
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Andrew Newton, 2006/02/21
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/21
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Peter Koch, 2006/02/15
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Markley, Mike, 2006/02/14
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, John Levine, 2006/02/14
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/15

[ietf-dkim] New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Markley, Mike, 2006/02/14

• Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Mark Delany, 2006/02/14
• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/14
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/14
• Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Hector Santos, 2006/02/14
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/15
• RE: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/20
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: TLD key publication and signing, Andrew Newton, 2006/02/20

[ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/10

• Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/10
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/10
    • RE: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Bill.Oxley, 2006/02/10
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/10
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/11
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/11
    • [ietf-dkim] New issue: base-00 3.5 x= (was: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec), Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/11
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/11
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: New issue: base-00 3.5 x=, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: base-00 3.5 x= (was: testing Message Corpus& question for base spec), Hector Santos, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: base-00 3.5 x= (was: testing Message Corpus& question for base spec), Douglas Otis, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: base-00 3.5 x= (was: testing Message Corpus& question for base spec), Hector Santos, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/11
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/12
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Tony Hansen, 2006/02/10
• Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos, 2006/02/10
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Eric Allman, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Eric Allman, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Eric Allman, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Mark Delany, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos, 2006/02/15
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Mark Delany, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Eric Allman, 2006/02/16
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/20
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Hector Santos, 2006/02/22
• RE: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Bill.Oxley, 2006/02/16
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] testing Message Corpus & question for base spec, Mark Delany, 2006/02/16

[ietf-dkim] fyi- current open issues, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/09

• Re: [ietf-dkim] fyi- current open issues, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/09
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: fyi- current open issues, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/09
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] fyi- current open issues, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/11

RE: [ietf-dkim] RFC 4387 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Operational Protocols: Certificate Store Access via HTTP (fwd), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/02/07

• Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC 4387 on Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Operational Protocols: Certificate Store Access via HTTP (fwd), Mark Delany, 2006/02/08

[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-00 submitted, Eric Allman, 2006/02/03

• Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-00 submitted, SM, 2006/02/04
• Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-00 submitted, Mark Delany, 2006/02/15

[ietf-dkim] New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/01

• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/01
• Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/02
  • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/02
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/02
    • RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Bill.Oxley, 2006/02/03
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/03
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/03
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/08
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Jim Fenton, 2006/02/12
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/12
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/12
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/12
    • [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/12
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/14
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Hector Santos, 2006/02/14
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/14
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Hector Santos, 2006/02/14
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/03
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/03
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Threat-00 Limiting the scope of trust, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/03

[ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Jeff Macdonald, 2006/02/01

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/01
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Jeff Macdonald, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Hector Santos, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Mark Delany, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Hector Santos, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/02
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Michael Thomas, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Hector Santos, 2006/02/01
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/02/02
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Bill.Oxley, 2006/02/01
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Can vendor's really say they have DKIM support yet?, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/01

Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Hector Santos, 2006/02/01

• [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/01
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Hector Santos, 2006/02/02
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Douglas Otis, 2006/02/02
    • Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: New Issue: 4.2 needs new Attack Item: InconsistentSignature vs Policy Attacks, Hector Santos, 2006/02/02

[ietf-dkim] now up on roundup tracker, Eliot Lear, 2006/02/01

• Re: [ietf-dkim] now up on roundup tracker, Dave Crocker, 2006/02/01
• [ietf-dkim] Re: now up on roundup tracker, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/01

[ietf-dkim] Measurement Results on Deployment Ratio of Domain Authentications, 山本和彦, 2006/02/01

• Re: [ietf-dkim] Measurement Results on Deployment Ratio of Domain Authentications, Stephen Farrell, 2006/02/01
• [ietf-dkim] Re: Measurement Results on Deployment Ratio of Domain Authentications, Frank Ellermann, 2006/02/01