Dave Crocker wrote:
or the response. So just implementing
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/specs/draft-allman-dkim-base-00-10dc.txt
without SSP is considered a valid DKIM implementation?
>
> Thanks for the response. So just implementing
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/specs/draft-allman-dkim-base-00-10dc.txt
> without SSP is considered a valid DKIM implementation?
As I recall, people have had some debate about this exact point.
I believe, quite strongly, that implementing the core signature
mechanism definitely qualifies as implementing DKIM.
While I don't disagree with Dave, I guess I ought to point out
the obvious, just for the record. Hopefully, there's no debate
needed.
Implementing an Internet-Draft is not implementing a standard.
For the latter, the RFC has to exist.
If you choose to write code based on an Internet-Draft you are
taking a risk that the specification changes before it becomes
a standard.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org