On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:49:44AM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
Jeff Macdonald wrote:
The standard isn't finalized yet, correct? So how can we have vendors
say they have conforming implementations?
I'm talking DKIM, not DK.
The version of DKIM that was submitted to the IETF was the result of an
extensive, multi-vendor specification and development effort. In effect,
the IETF effort is for the purpose of creating version FOUR of DomainKeys.
By this measure, version THREE is first one called DKIM.
Please take a look at <http://mipassoc.org/dkim> for more information.
Dave,
Thanks for the response. So just implementing
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/specs/draft-allman-dkim-base-00-10dc.txt
without SSP is considered a valid DKIM implementation?
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org