> Thanks for the response. So just implementing
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/specs/draft-allman-dkim-base-00-10dc.txt
> without SSP is considered a valid DKIM implementation?
Just my opinion but I consider such implementations valid - just
incomplete. I have no problem with claims of "DKIM support" or "DKIM
enabled" by such implementations (although it would be clearer if those
implementations stated that they supported base only and not ssp). I
think eventually a "fully DKIM-enabled" product will have to embrace all
the parts of DKIM though.
--
Arvel
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org