Since my question before was hijacked by a totally different thread, I'm
going to ask again under another thread:
We allow extra options to be specified in a DKIM-Signature header, but
do not allow extra options to be specified in a DKIM TXT record. (I
don't recall this being discussed before, but just may not remember it.)
Should we? If not, how would we do upwardly-compatible changes without
requiring multiple DNS entries for both an old and new entry?
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://dkim.org/ietf-list-rules.html