----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Delany" <MarkD+dkim(_at_)yahoo-inc(_dot_)com>
To: "IETF-DKIM" <ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification
language,for now
And as long as the target doesn't forward or relay through a
non-interactive link.
All the more reason why a passthru system should yield to traditional
practice and not tamper with mail. :-)
The client is targeting a MDA validator. It has no clue what happens
in-between but if this capability logic is put into place, don't you think
the forwarding/relay network would be up to par?
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html