ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now

2006-02-22 11:57:06



It means that the software implementation supports it as a selectable option.
If you don't say this what's to prevent someone from writing an implementation that only supports Camilla-MAC hashing and calling it
compliant?

ok.  understand.

i had completely forgotten the concerns about both marketing and product acquisition that the spec needs to cover.

Yes, declaring requirements for core "capabilities" pertains to the customer/user activity BEFORE sending any bits.

thanks.

d/

--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>