Eliot Lear wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:
Ok, but that doesn't exactly answer my question. Is it really the
case that sha-256 will be The annointed successor for the time
being? Especially in light of the above? Transitions are never
easy and forcing one might be a cure worse than the disease.
It is for now. That's what the SAAG meeting was all about.
Well, it's not *exactly* it: there's still SHA-1. Two upgrades
in the space of a few years is going to be painful. Maybe inevitable,
but still painful.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html