On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:20:57AM -0800, Dave Crocker allegedly wrote:
I keep coming back to the very limited goal of DKIM and wondering whether the
concern about a downgrade attack isn't just a little too esoteric for that
goal.
It happens that it also solves the agility requirement too. So even if
you're skeptical of downgrade attacks being relevant, we are hoping -
I presume - that DKIM will live for longer than the current set of
anointed algorithms and that we do need a way to transition that
doesn't require a forklift.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://dkim.org/ietf-list-rules.html