For those keeping score, here are the open issues.
*1170 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1170>* * Introduction
lacks the introduction of SSP
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1170>* new dkim Nobody 0
hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com 4 weeks ago
4 weeks ago 0
*1171 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1171>*
*draft-ietf-dkim-threats-00 Clarification of the DKIM mechanism
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1171>* new dkim Nobody 0
dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org 4 weeks ago
4 weeks ago 0
*1172 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1172>* *disagreement
on impact and probability of Attacks Against Message Signatures
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1172>* new dkim Nobody 0
dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org 4 weeks ago
4 weeks ago 0
*1173 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1173>* *Does Section
4.1.4 properly address traceability and accountability?
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1173>* new dkim Nobody 0
dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org 4 weeks ago
4 weeks ago 0
*1174 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1174>*
*raft-ietf-dkim-threats-00 Limited information in a critical section
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1174>* new dkim Nobody 0
dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org 4 weeks ago
4 weeks ago 0
*1180 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1180>*
*draft-ietf-dkim-threats-00 DKIM can be effective within the
Originator's AdmD <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1180>*
open dkim Nobody 0
dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org 3 weeks ago
3 weeks ago 0
*1181 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1181>* *Misleading
figure in 1.1 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1181>* new
dkim Nobody 0
nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de 3 weeks ago
3 weeks ago 0
*1182 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1182>* *Eavesdropping
may permit man-in-the-middle as well
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1182>* new dkim Nobody 0
dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org 3 weeks ago
3 weeks ago 0
*1183 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1183>* *carryover:
draft-allman-dkim-base-01.txt - Should we have an r= tag in either the
signature or key record
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1183>* new dkim Nobody 0
lear(_at_)ofcourseimright(_dot_)com 3 weeks ago
3 weeks ago 0
*1184 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1184>* *carryover:
Develop plan for transition of multiple crypto algs (a=)
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1184>* new dkim Nobody 0
lear(_at_)ofcourseimright(_dot_)com 3 weeks ago
3 weeks ago 0
*1185 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1185>* *carryover:
draft-allman-dkim-base-01.txt Transition sha-1 to sha-256
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1185>* new dkim Nobody 0
lear(_at_)ofcourseimright(_dot_)com 3 weeks ago
3 weeks ago 0
*1186 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1186>* *4.2 needs new
Attack Item: Inconsistent Signature vs Policy Attacks
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1186>* new dkim Nobody 0
hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com 3 weeks ago
3 weeks ago 0
*1190 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1190>* *base-00 3.5 x=
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1190>* new dkim Nobody 0
nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de 9 days ago
9 days ago 0
*1192 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1192>* *TLD key
publication and signing
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1192>* new dkim Nobody 0
Mike(_dot_)Markley(_at_)bankofamerica(_dot_)com 7 days ago
7 days ago 0
*1193 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1193>* *base spec:
instead of signing the message, sign the hash
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1193>* new dkim Nobody 0
lear(_at_)ofcourseimright(_dot_)com 7 days ago
7 days ago 0
*1194 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1194>* *base spec:
whitespace in signature?
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1194>* new dkim Nobody 0
eric(_at_)sendmail(_dot_)com 7 days ago
7 days ago 0
*1195 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1195>*
*draft-ietf-dkim-base-00 - 3.4.6 Example (Canonicalization)
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1195>* new dkim Nobody 0
hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com 6 days ago
6 days ago 0
*1196 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1196>* *Base: Upgrade
indication and protection against downgrade attacks
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1196>* new dkim Nobody 0
MarkD+dkim(_at_)yahoo-inc(_dot_)com 6 days ago
6 days ago 0
*1200 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1200>* *MUST vs SHOULD
in Verifier Actions section (-base)
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1200>* new dkim Nobody 0
eric(_at_)sendmail(_dot_)com 4 days ago
4 days ago 0
*1201 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1201>* *change the
syntax from SPF compat to human compat
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1201>* new dkim Nobody 0
MarkD+dkim(_at_)yahoo-inc(_dot_)com 4 days ago
4 days ago 0
*1203 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1203>* *extendable RR
records? <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1203>* new dkim
Nobody 0
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com 24 hours ago
24 hours ago 0
*1204 <https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1204>* *issue with
DKIM simple header algorithm and milter-based implementations
<https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=1204>* new dkim Nobody 0
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com 1 min ago
1 min ago 0
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://dkim.org/ietf-list-rules.html