Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?

ietf-dkim

2006-03-16 13:06:32

> Do we have any data on deployed key sizes?

FYI, none of our deployments are using less than 1024. Our softwaregenerates default keys for the user automatically at 1024.


--
Arvel

_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Mark Delany Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Eric Rescorla Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Arvel Hathcock <= Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Russ Housley Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Arvel Hathcock Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Russ Housley Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Mark Delany

Previous by Date:	[ietf-dkim] Now supporting rsa-sha256, Murray S. Kucherawy
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] ABNF: Sender = Originator / Operator, Dave Crocker
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Eric Rescorla
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?, Paul Hoffman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]