ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: 512 too short?

2006-03-18 18:27:39
That is a fine improvement.

Russ


At 01:49 PM 3/17/2006, Arvel Hathcock wrote:
> Proposed text:
> Since short RSA keys are susceptible off-line attacks, signers MUST

That text sounds good to me but maybe "Since short RSA keys more easily succumb to off-line attacks, ..." is more precise?

--
Arvel


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html