Jim Fenton wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:
How about:
Signers SHOULD NOT use keys less that 1024 bits, receivers MUST
accept keys less that 1024 but MAY consider weaker keys as more
suspicious.
(where "suspicious" has been used before in the draft to mean
something along the lines of heightened scrutiny, etc).
"Suspicious" is currently only used in the SSP draft; its meaning in
this context would need to be introduced here if it is to be used.
FWIW, I'm fine with Russ/Arvel's text.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html