Stephen Farrell wrote:
I'd like there to be a very clear consensus as to what's included
here, e.g. we are not going to mandate who generates keys, so
we thus cannot say whether a private key is being used for >1
sending domain. As it is, the feature is mentioned a number of
times, without ever really saying what's to be supported.
I do not understand what existing (or missing) text you are concerned about.
I also do not understand what problem you are identifying.
Unfortunately this means that I have no clue about what is needed to fix the
issue you are raising.
That may create potential holes. The problem is that there might be
many of those.
How is this a "hole"?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html