Well, it certainly is so much easier to write security protocols
if you don't require them to be actually, you know, secure.
Oh. So you see a technical flaw in DKIM?
Please cite it. Please indicate what solutions will resolve it.
Failing that, please explain what you mean.
Not too happy about having the word disingenuous applied to the
analysis you posted?
No, just bored.
Have you ever noticed how someone making that statement, at the end of an
energetic exchange that they have not won, mostly never means it?
I wonder if that qualifies as disingenuous?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html